NOTES REGARDING STANDING TO SUE

Larkin:

Why are you arguing their "code"?  Factually the "code" is just the will of the legislature.  As per John King Mfg v City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100, 102:
 
In usage, 'statute' is a term which has both a restricted and a broad signification. This is reflection in the following excerpt from Bouvier's Law Dictionary, Rawle's Revision: 
 
'Statute.-A law established by the act of the legislative power. An act of the Legislature. The written will of the Legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms necessary to constitute it the law of the state.
 
You can also find that phrase "the will of the legislature" in Black's 2nd (1910) and Black's 6th (1990).  The "code" as well as any "statute" is just an opinion.  What are the underlying facts to the "code"?  What facts/evidence is there that makes one liable?  Does the written "the will of the legislature" make one liable?  Factually, what is Congress?  Just a group of men and women.  Can you demand from your neighbor to apy you a "tax"?  Can you take his property without his permission?  Can you claim your neighbor has a debt with you because you spend some funds at Walmart?  We are all human, that is a fact.  Argue facts and evidence, not opinions.  The 861 "evidence" is an opinion not facts.
 
Another problem that was not brought up in your case and Tessa's case was the issue of standing.  The "government" or as it most likely titled, United States of America v Larkin Rose, did not have standing to file the case.  See Rule 9a and 17a of the Federal Rules of Procedure (FRP).  Factually, what is the United States of America?  Just a mental conception.  There must be a real human to file a complaint [this should say “to file an action”].  There must have been a violation of a legal Right and damage to the complaining party.  There are numerous cases on standing.  A few for example are:
 
Elk Grove Unified School District v Newdow, US case # 02-1624 (2004); 
Bender v Williamsport Area School Dist, 475 US 534 (1986); 
Allen v Wright, 468 US 737 (1984); 
Valley Forge College v American United, 454 US 464 (1982); 
Warth v Seldin, 422 US 490 (1975); 
Tyler v Judges of the Court of Registration, 179 US 405 (1900), 

just to name a few from the US "court".  There are plenty of state cases also.
 
Armed with this knowledge, you should file a habeas corpus to get Tessa out of jail just based on the lack of standing.  This goes to Rule 12b(6) in the FRP, failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.  You will not get a lawyer to help you on this in a "criminal" case.  The lawyer will be disbarred.  Ask a lawyer about standing.  They know about it.
 
Stop arguing their "code".  Argue facts and evidence.
 
Sal Jr
SALJRKJMN@aol.com